Abstract

In this contribution, as comments to the paper in Composite Structures 262 (2021) 113604, will be shown that one of the shape function is not correctly described. This shape function is recorded during presenting the displacement field, and it was wrongly used as a part of the transverse shear strains. The correct form of the shape function is explained more deeply in the literature.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.