Abstract
In this commentary, I follow up on Chandler and Pugh’s (2021) article, ‘Anthropocene Islands: There Are Only Islands After the End of the World’, to explore two central facets of their argument. First, I explore just why analyses of dynamic patterns of relational entanglements in island environments are particularly detrimental to modernist fantasies of a dichotomous world. Second, I critique whether the frame of ‘the Anthropocene’ is the most accurate way to depict the emerging knowledges of relationality in island (and other) geographies.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
