Abstract

The politics of self-determination in non-independent Caribbean islands features both common and divergent outcomes. The common outcome is a weakness of secessionism. The divergent outcome is the broader politics over status. Using a comparison of Puerto Rico (where secessionism is weak and the constitutional status is strongly contested) and Aruba (where secessionism is also weak but the status broadly accepted), this article refines arguments found in the literature on why non-independent island territories eschew the pursuit of independence, and it formulates an explanation for variation in the politics over status based on the symbolic value of institutions and historical processes of othering.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.