ISH YURITISHNI ISTISNO QILUVCHI HOLАTLАRNING HUQUQIY TАRTIBGА SOLINISH MUАMMOLАRI

Abstract

In this article, the problems of legal regulation of circumstances excluding proceedings are investigated from a practical point of view. The article also examines the degree of conformity of decisions taken in practice based on the results of a pre-investigation check to refuse to monitor a criminal case with the grounds for terminating a criminal case without resolving the issue of guilt of Article 84 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan, as well as conflicting circumstances that arise. The author expresses the opinion that the rehabilitated grounds in the Criminal Procedure case should be reflected in a separate chapter, and these grounds should be established in the norm of circumstances precluding the proceedings. The article also examines the content and advantages of grounds for refusal and termination of criminal cases, which is reflected in the Criminal Procedure legislation of foreign states. The study used such methods as analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, comparative legal analysis. In the research work, advanced foreign experience, scientific and theoretical views, and investigative and judicial practice were studied, as a result of which proposals and recommendations have been developed for making appropriate amendments and additions to the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan.