Abstract
In this article, the problems of legal regulation of circumstances excluding proceedings are investigated from a practical point of view. The article also examines the degree of conformity of decisions taken in practice based on the results of a pre-investigation check to refuse to monitor a criminal case with the grounds for terminating a criminal case without resolving the issue of guilt of Article 84 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan, as well as conflicting circumstances that arise. The author expresses the opinion that the rehabilitated grounds in the Criminal Procedure case should be reflected in a separate chapter, and these grounds should be established in the norm of circumstances precluding the proceedings. The article also examines the content and advantages of grounds for refusal and termination of criminal cases, which is reflected in the Criminal Procedure legislation of foreign states. The study used such methods as analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, comparative legal analysis. In the research work, advanced foreign experience, scientific and theoretical views, and investigative and judicial practice were studied, as a result of which proposals and recommendations have been developed for making appropriate amendments and additions to the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
