Ischemic cardiomyopathy: Medical versus surgical treatment

Abstract

The natural history of patients with ischemic heart disease and depressed left ventricular function is dismal, and medical therapy has failed to alter its course. To assess the results of aorta-coronary bypass grafting in patients with coronary artery disease and decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF less than or equal to 0.3), we compared 70 medically treated patients to 46 patients having aorta-coronary bypass grafting. The duration of follow-up was 6 to 72 months (mean 19 months). All patients had angina pectoris. Congestive heart failure was present in 56 percent (39/70) of the medical and 43 percent (20/46) of the surgical group. The medical group had a mean LVEF of 0.20 and a mean left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) of 29 mm. Hg. The surgical group had a mean LVEF of 0.21 and a mean LVEDP of 24 mm. Hg. Three vessel disease was found in 60 percent (42/70) of the medical group and 83 percent (38/46) of the surgical group. The operative mortality rate in the surgical group was 4 percent (2/46). There were four late deaths. The 2 year actuarial survival rate for medical and surgical groups was 47 percent and 83 percent, respectively. Significant improvement in angina pectoris and/or congestive heart failure was found in 16 percent (11/70) of medically treated patients and 95 percent (38/40) of the surgically treated patients. Aorta-coronary bypass grafting can be performed in patients with poor left ventricular function with a low operative mortality rate, relief of angina pectoris, and improvement in symptoms of congestive heart failure.