Abstract

We extend our understanding on the role of wine investment within a portfolio of different assets (US/UK equities, bonds, gold, and housing) by considering a rich methodology based, among others, on the mean-variance and stochastic-dominance approaches. The main findings suggest that wine is the best investment among all individual assets under study, and investors prefer to invest in with-wine portfolios than without-wine portfolios to gain higher expected utility when short selling is not allowed. However, investors are indifferent between portfolios with and without wine when short-selling is allowed. In addition, with-wine portfolios generally either dominate individual assets or investors are indifferent in choosing between individual assets. Interestingly, the with-wine portfolios first-order stochastically dominate housing in both the long-only and short-allowed strategies, pointing towards market inefficiency. Finally, we reveal that investors prefer the low-risk with-wine portfolios to the equal-weighted portfolios but are indifferent between the high-risk with-wine portfolios and the naïve portfolios for both long-only and short-allowed strategies. Our findings can be used by investors in their investment processes, and reveal the possibility of earning abnormal returns when wine is included in the investment.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call