Abstract

Cue-approach training (CAT) is a novel paradigm that has been shown to induce preference changes towards items without external reinforcements. In the task, the mere association of a neutral cue and a speeded button response has been shown to induce a behavioral choice preference change lasting for months. This paradigm includes several phases: after the training of individual items, behavior change is manifested in binary choices of items with similar initial values. Neuroimaging data have implicated the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) in the choice phase of this task. However, the neural mechanisms underlying the preference changes induced by training remain unclear. Here, we asked whether the ventromedial frontal lobe (VMF) is critical for the non-reinforced preference change induced by CAT. For this purpose, 11 participants with focal lesions involving the VMF and 30 healthy age-matched controls performed the CAT. The VMF group was similar to the healthy age-matched control group in the ranking and training phases. As a group, the healthy age-matched controls exhibited a training-induced behavior change, while the VMF group did not. However, on an individual level analysis we found that some of the VMF participants showed a significant preference shift. Thus, we find mixed evidence for the role of VMF in this paradigm. This is another step towards defining the mechanisms underlying the novel form of behavioral change that occurs with CAT.

Highlights

  • Decision neuroscience has contributed to the understanding of maladaptive motivated behavior in conditions such as substance abuse, pathological gambling, and obesity (Bechara, 2005; Davis et al, 2004; Diekhof et al, 2008; Ernst and Paulus, 2005; Goudriaan et al, 2005)

  • In this study, we examined whether ventromedial frontal cortex (VMF) is critical for behavior change that does not rely on external reinforcement with the novel cue approach task

  • We found that the same proportion of participants in the VMF group and healthy aged-matched controls showed an individual preference change effect

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Decision neuroscience has contributed to the understanding of maladaptive motivated behavior in conditions such as substance abuse, pathological gambling, and obesity (Bechara, 2005; Davis et al, 2004; Diekhof et al, 2008; Ernst and Paulus, 2005; Goudriaan et al, 2005). This knowledge offers opportunities for the development of new interventions to support behavior change. The CAT shows that an association of a neutral cue and a motor response with individual items (termed “Go” items) can change preference for different stimuli without external reinforcement or self-control, offering a novel avenue for addressing maladaptive choices

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call