Abstract

This paper aims to review the relevant literature on the role of management accounting in organizational management. It also compares traditional and new or strategic management accounting and their limitations. It focused on the role of management accounting in the constitution of organizations and the ways in which management accounting systems as structures of intentionality both shape and are shaped by shared norms and understandings. The findings help to understand the concerns of the current mainstream in management accounting literature. In fact, the findings cohere with Hopwood and Scapens and their followers in the sense that management accounting is not a static phenomenon but one that changes over time to reflect new forms and practices. It was also found that management accounting is part and parcel of organizational change. By reviewing a subset of the studies on accounting history published during the period 1980 - 2018, this paper updates accounting history literature by focusing on management accounting research. The paper also contributes to the existing literature by presenting the discussions of management accounting and organizational change. However, other studies can consider this paper as starting point to examine other areas of accounting such as financial accounting.

Highlights

  • Contemporary accounting studies have shed light on how accounting is practiced in social activities and arrangements

  • The aim of this study is to review the relevant literature on management accounting (MA) and organizational change

  • The findings cohere with Hopwood and Scapens and their followers that management accounting is not a static phenomenon but one that changes over time to reflect new forms and practices

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Contemporary accounting studies have shed light on how accounting is practiced in social activities and arrangements. The aim of this study is to review the relevant literature on management accounting (MA) and organizational change It compares the traditional and the new/strategic management accounting. The study focuses on the potentials and limitations of both types of management accounting to highlight which of them is more dominant and popular. This aim helps in understanding the related pedagogy, policy, and practices. The third section compares traditional and strategic management accounting and its limitations It highlights which is dominant and still in use. It is followed by discussing change in management accounting and its relationship with organizational change.

Literature Review Traditional Functions of Management Accounting
Management Accounting and Organizational Management
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call