Is there etiologic heterogeneity between upper and lower neural tube defects?

Abstract

Neural tube defects are thought to arise from two different embryologic mechanisms depending on the level of the defect: neurulation defects associated with anencephaly and upper spina bifida and canalization defects associated with lower spina bifida. To investigate whether the risk profiles of neural tube defect cases differ according to the level of the defect, the authors examined data from the Atlanta Birth Defects Case-Control Study. Cases were infants live- or stillborn from 1968 to 1980 with these defects, and controls were infants without defects randomly selected and frequency matched to cases by race, birth year, and hospital of birth. By multivariate polychotomous logistic regression, 1,186 controls were compared with cases: 145 with anencephaly, 59 with upper spina bifida (cervical/thoracic lesions), and 100 with lower spina bifida (lumbar/sacral lesions). Infant's sex and sibling recurrence of neural tube defects were the only factors for which the case subgroups significantly differed in risk. The risks associated with selected maternal exposures during the first trimester of pregnancy did not differ among the case subgroups. Although these results do not support the concept that upper and lower neural tube defects differ in risks from exogenous factors, differences in sibling recurrence and in risks by sex between the two groups suggest an underlying heterogeneity in genetic susceptibility factors.