Is there enough time to train? An audit of core surgical training rotas

Abstract

BackgroundThe Joint Committee on Surgical Training (JCST) have published a series of quality indicators (QIs) which act as a benchmark against which the quality of surgical training can be assessed. This audit aims to compare core surgical training (CST) rotas in our region against the JCST QI 10's minimum standard of 5 consultant supervised training sessions per week. MethodsCore surgical trainees in one training region were contacted requesting their on-call rotas from rotations undertaken during the 2019/20 academic year. Rotas were analysed in a protocolised manner, with the number of potential training sessions available calculated and compared against the JCST QI 10 minimum recommendation. ResultsTwenty-four rotas were assessed across 17 hospitals. Only six (25%) of rotas achieved the JCST QI 10 standard. There was a mean deficit of 18.5 (±29.5) training sessions per 6-month rotation. Rotas compliant with JCST QI 10 used a mean rota pattern of 1 in 11 compared to 1 in 9 for those failing to meet the target.Further analysis, comprising of the addition of expected consultant led training whilst on call, led to an improvement in compliance to 9 (38%) and 13 (54%) of rotas when there was an addition of 0.5 h and 1 h of consultant supervised training time per on-call session respectively. ConclusionMany core surgical trainee rotas in the region are non-compliant with JCST QI 10, indicating a lack of regular consultant-led training opportunities. A move to a reduced on-call commitment with the use of supporting medical practitioners could be considered to improve this.