Is There Attenuation of Benefit of Invasive Therapy in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease? Results from Randomized Trials and Registry Data

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is not only a common comorbidity among patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), it is also an entity that portends worse short- and long-term prognosis. Differences in the pathophysiology of arterial atherosclerosis and calcification, chronic inflammation, platelet reactivity, and thrombogenicity in patients with and without CKD underpin the increased vulnerability of CKD patients with ACS to subsequent ischemic and bleeding complications. These differences, as well as the frequent exclusion of CKD patients from randomized control trials, create uncertainty regarding the benefit of invasive treatment for ACS in patients with CKD. The limited evidence from randomized trials suggests a benefit with invasive treatment in CKD patients with ACS. However, some data from registry studies suggest no benefit or even harm with invasive therapy. Thus, the optimal management of ACS in patients with CKD, in particular end-stage CKD, remains uncertain. In this article we review the characteristics of coronary artery disease in patients with CKD, the available evidence pertaining to the outcomes of CKD patients with ACS with invasive versus conservative therapy, and potential areas for reducing complications of invasive therapy in this high-risk subset of patients.