Is there anything nontrivial about caring in nursing that is rigorously measureable?

Abstract

Is there anything about the well-developed body of theory around caring in nursing that leads towards improved measurement and management? Nursing is primarily practical in character; remarkably, the theory of caring in nursing remains to this day disconnected from practice in fundamental ways. Habermas' developmental theory of moral consciousness, rooted in the work of Kohlberg, supports a theory of caring in nursing as a form of communicative action. The genesis of this connection between caring in nursing and communicative action is deeply rooted in human vulnerability and the need for ‘considerateness.’ Vulnerability is always present in any human interaction and none more so than in nursing. The theory components were the personal selves of both nurse and patient, the professional self of the nurse, the illness self of the patient and interaction. It is within the latter that moral maturity emerges across preconventional, conventional and post conventional developmental levels. Metrologically, concept analysis of the theory had to be focused by the demands of scale construction on writing testable items. Pilot studies were conducted in three countries; seven subscales were theorized and identified in the data. Cronbach's Alpha was over .85 for all scales, with acceptable model fit. The subscales measure the theoretical constructs in ways utilizable in nursing practice.