Is there an optimal dose of cardiac rehabilitation in coronary artery disease patients?

Abstract

BackgroundMany studies have shown that participation in cardiac rehabilitation reduces long-term morbidity and mortality after myocardial infarction. Therefore, both American and European evidence-based guidelines recommend cardiac rehabilitation. However, it is still unclear what the optimal dose of cardiac rehabilitation is. MethodologyThe study is a monocenter, retrospective cohort study. We identified patients with stable ischemic heart disease, who participated in at least one phase II center-based cardiac rehabilitation session between 2010 and 2015. A total of 609 patients were included in this study. ResultsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 609 patients. Statistically significant baseline differences between the four groups were observed for index coronary artery revascularization technique, age, dual antiplatelet therapy and smoking status. A total of number of 84 patients (13.8%) had a MACE in the four-year follow-up period. After adjustment for all significant predictors in the univariate analysis, patients who attended 36 or more sessions had a 47% lower risk of MACE (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31 to 0.92), patients who attended 24 to 35 sessions had a 68% lower risk of MACE (hazard ratio [HR], 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15 to 0.67), patients who attended 12 to 23 sessions had a 56% lower risk of MACE (hazard ratio [HR], 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21 to 0.92) than those who attended 1 to 11 sessions. ConclusionThere is a clear clinical benefit from participating in more than 11 CR sessions. The best outcomes are achieved in patient who participated between 24 and 35 CR sessions. These results underline again the importance of improving participation and adherence to CR programmes in Europe.