Abstract

IntroductionEvidence for second transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) for pTa high-grade lesions is limited. This study aims to examine the role of a second TURBT in the pTa high-grade group and to generate recurrence and progression data for this group.Material and methodsWe retrospectively studied the clinical profiles and outcomes of all patients diagnosed with high-grade pTa lesions at first TURBT, between the years 2006–2015. Firstly, in patients who underwent a complete first TURBT, we calculated the proportion of patients with positive findings on second TURBT. Secondly, we assessed whether those who underwent a second TURBT had a longer recurrence-free survival compared to those who underwent a single TURBT.ResultsOne hundred and twelve patients had a pTa high-grade urothelial bladder tumor (WHO 2004 classification) at first TURBT, out of whom 43 (38.3%) had a second TURBT. Indications for second TURBT were high-grade lesions (n = 36), absence of detrusor muscle (n = 2), and incomplete resection (n = 5). Out of the 36 patients who had a complete first TURBT and underwent a second look TURBT, 7 patients had positive findings (3 carcinoma in situ, 2 pTa low-grade lesions and 2 pTa high-grade lesions) and there was no upstaging. Of the 5 patients with an incomplete first TURBT, one upstaged to pT1 on second TURBT. Of the 81 patients who followed up with us, 25.9% had a recurrence and 8.6% progressed. The estimated median recurrence free survival was 60 months (95% CI 29.2–90.7) for the whole group and 76 months vs. 45 months for the second and single TURBT group respectively – a difference that was clinically, though not statistically, significant. Multiple (≥2) tumours had a lower recurrence free survival (HR of 4.60, CI 1.67-12.63, p = 0.003).ConclusionsOf the patients with pTa high-grade tumours who had a second TURBT after a complete first TURBT, 19.4% had a positive finding. Multiple tumours are four times as likely to recur as solitary tumours. The role of a second TURBT in this group needs to be studied in larger patient cohorts before a recommendation regarding its lack of clinical utility can be made conclusively.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.