Abstract

Simple SummaryDebates about animal research are often polarized. On one side, increased knowledge, medical treatments or enhanced animal production are seen to justify harms. On the other, animals have rights constraining their use. Both sides fail to provide adequate support for this contentious use of animals. Reflecting the richness of ethics, it is suggested that empathy and respect for the animal, and greater acknowledgement of the value of experiences and care could also be considered. Along with a more informed understanding of the benefits of research and of the aims of animal rights, a more sophisticated ethic may reflect the common ground between the poles of the debate.Although reflecting a long tradition of moral reflection that the use of animals is acceptable as long as it is humane, the tension between causing harm to animals in research and the benefits to humans can nevertheless be troubling. Utilitarian arguments that appeal to the value of those practices in sustaining and enhancing human lives, and rights-based arguments which seek to constrain them, can be inadequate. Reflecting a more engaging, inclusive and sophisticated understanding of human activity, justification for animal use could be expanded to reflect the fullness and richness of ethical thinking. This might see more explicit inclusion of perspectives borne of virtues, caring, experiences, and respect for the essence of the animal, and different ways of understanding and knowing animals, values drawn from the middle ground of commonly acceptable human-animal relationships. Such values, already clearly evident in research, could be more widely integrated into arguments justifying animal use. A more expansive approach would not only reflect reality and acknowledge that costs and benefits are shared more widely, but it might result in more equitable, effective and humane science. It might also serve to reduce some of the tension long evident in the relationship between humans and animals.

Highlights

  • The real value of ethics in providing different insights into complex issues appears to have been overlooked. In this personal reflection based on several decades of involvement in science and ethics (e.g., [15,16,17]) it is suggested that the debate over the use of animals in science could benefit from a more engaging, inclusive or sophisticated understanding of human activity—that actions or conduct involves making choices with certain consequences, within the constraints imposed by society [18]

  • It is suggested that traditional ethical reflection on the use of animals in science makes little explicit use of this knowledge of animals, risking a relationship based on minimal respect for animals

  • A more engaging ethic could be developed by those responsible for animal care, and by those with oversight of animal treatment and those with an interest in animals

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The real value of ethics in providing different insights into complex issues appears to have been overlooked In this personal reflection based on several decades of involvement in science and ethics (e.g., [15,16,17]) it is suggested that the debate over the use of animals in science could benefit from a more engaging, inclusive or sophisticated understanding of human activity—that actions or conduct involves making choices with certain consequences, within the constraints imposed by society [18]. Virtues and other values, a reflection of the ancient contract If these views are sound, they raise a number of opportunities for better understanding and justifying the use of animals in scientific research

Difficulties with Common Ethical Stances
Knowing Animals
Respect for the Research Animal
Discussion
Conclusions
Conflicts of Interest
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call