Abstract

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and lung cancer are strictly related. To date, it is unknown if COPD-associated cancers are different from the tumors of non-COPD patients. The main goal of the study was to compare the morphological/molecular profiles of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) samples of COPD, non-COPD/smokers and non-COPD/non-smokers, and to investigate if a genetic instability also characterized non-pathological areas. This study included 110 patients undergoing surgery for a LUAD, divided into three groups: COPD/smoker LUAD (38), non-COPD/smoker LUAD (54) and non-COPD/non-smoker LUAD (18). The tissue samples were systemically evaluated by pathologists and analyzed using a 30-gene Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) panel. In a subset of patients, tissues taken far from the neoplasia were also included. The non-COPD/smoker LUAD were characterized by a higher proliferative index (p = 0.001), while the non-COPD/non-smoker LUAD showed higher percentages of lepidic pattern (p = 0.008), lower necrosis, higher fibrosis, and a significantly lower mutation rate in the KRAS and PIK3CA genes. Interestingly, the same gene mutations were found in pathological and normal areas exclusively in the COPD/smokers and non-COPD/smokers. COPD/smoker LUAD seem to be similar to non-COPD/smoker LUAD, particularly for the genetic background. A less aggressive cancer phenotype was confirmed in non-COPD/non-smokers. The genetic alterations detected in normal lungs from smokers with and without COPD reinforce the importance of screening to detect early neoplastic lesions.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.