Abstract
Abstract : The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a dominant, effective human resource system configuration within the Army Medical Department. The final study sample size (n) included 36 Army medical treatment facilities of various care levels. Independent and dependent variables included patient satisfaction, executive satisfaction, financial performance, and human resource organization type. The data sources for this study were direct queries to individual facility Deputy Commanders for Administration and department chiefs, M2, and the Army Medical Command Management System (CMS). The results of the study revealed an strong prevalence of combined civilian and military human resource (HR) organizations (22 of 36) over separate civilian military human resource organizations (14 of 36). The distribution among survey respondents demonstrated a similar trend with combined HR accounting for 17 of 29 facilities and separate HR accounting for 12 of 29 facilities. However, human resource organization type comparisons failed to yield statistically significant correlations. The study is significant because of the increased pressure for Army medical treatment facilities to prove their competitive equivalence with the civilian sector and there is a growing body of literature that links successful human resource management practices and positive organizational outcomes such as profitability, patient satisfaction, and employee satisfaction.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.