Abstract

BackgroundRe-exploration for bleeding accounts for increased morbidity and mortality after major cardiac operations. The use of temporary epicardial pacemaker wires is a common procedure at many departments. The removal of these wires postoperatively can potentially lead to a serious bleeding necessitating intervention.MethodsFrom Jan 2011 till Dec 2015 a total of 4244 major cardiac procedures were carried out at our department. We used temporary epicardial pacemaker wires in all cases. We collected all re-explorations for bleeding and pericardial tamponade from our surgical database and then we focused on the late re-explorations, meaning on the 4th postoperative day and thereafter, trying to identify the removal of the temporary pacemaker wires as the definite cause of bleeding. Patients’ records and medication were examined.ResultsThirty-nine late re-explorations for bleeding, consisting of repeat sternotomies, thoracotomies and subxiphoid pericardial drainages, were gathered. Eight patients had an acute bleeding incidence after removal of the temporary wires (0.18%). In four of these patients, a pericardial drainage was inserted, whereas the remaining patients were re-explorated through a repeat sternotomy. Two patients died of the acute pericardial tamponade, three had a blood transfusion and one had a wound infection. Seven out of eight patients were either on dual antiplatelet therapy or on combination of aspirin and vitamin K antagonist.ConclusionsA need for re-exploration due to removal of the temporary pacemaker wires is a very rare complication, which however increases morbidity and mortality. Adjustment of the postoperative anticoagulation therapy at the time of removal of the wires could further minimize or even prevent this serious complication.

Highlights

  • Re-exploration for bleeding accounts for increased morbidity and mortality after major cardiac operations

  • We collected all reoperations for bleeding and pericardial draining after cardiac surgery in this time period and we focused on the late procedures, meaning on the 4th postoperative day (POD) and thereafter, in order to coincide with the removal of the epicardial pacemaker wires (EPW)

  • A late re-exploration was necessary in 39 patients (0.92%), varying from the 4th till the 30th POD

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Re-exploration for bleeding accounts for increased morbidity and mortality after major cardiac operations. The use of temporary epicardial pacemaker wires is a common procedure at many departments The removal of these wires postoperatively can potentially lead to a serious bleeding necessitating intervention. The use of temporary epicardial pacemaker wires (EPW) after cardiac procedures is a standard routine at many cardiac surgical departments [1] These temporary wires are removed postoperatively after a stable cardiac rhythm has been established. A rare but potentially hazardous complication of removal of these wires is the development of a cardiac tamponade necessitating the re-exploration of the patient [1,2,3]. The use of temporary epicardial pacemaker wires is a standard and these are routinely removed on the 4th to 5th postoperative day (POD) by patients in stable cardiac rhythms, whereas in cases of transient atrioventricular block or new postoperative atrial fibrillation demanding electrical or pharmaceutical cardioversion the wires are taken out later. Careful monitoring of coagulation by means of laboratory measurement of the international normalized ratio (INR) and the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) is standard before removing

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.