Abstract

The voter model has been studied extensively as a paradigmatic opinion dynamics model. However, its ability to model real opinion dynamics has not been addressed. We introduce a noisy voter model (accounting for social influence) with recurrent mobility of agents (as a proxy for social context), where the spatial and population diversity are taken as inputs to the model. We show that the dynamics can be described as a noisy diffusive process that contains the proper anisotropic coupling topology given by population and mobility heterogeneity. The model captures statistical features of U.S. presidential elections as the stationary vote-share fluctuations across counties and the long-range spatial correlations that decay logarithmically with the distance. Furthermore, it recovers the behavior of these properties when the geographical space is coarse grained at different scales-from the county level through congressional districts, and up to states. Finally, we analyze the role of the mobility range and the randomness in decision making, which are consistent with the empirical observations.

Highlights

  • Opinion dynamics focuses on the way different options compete in a population, giving rise to either consensus or coexistence of several opinions

  • We introduce a noisy voter model with recurrent mobility of agents, where the spatial and population diversity are taken as inputs to the model

  • We show that the dynamics can be described as a noisy diffusive process that contains the proper anisotropic coupling topology given by population and mobility heterogeneity

Read more

Summary

Is the Voter Model a Model for Voters?

The model captures statistical features of U.S presidential elections as the stationary vote-share fluctuations across counties and the long-range spatial correlations that decay logarithmically with the distance. It recovers the behavior of these properties when the geographical space is coarse grained at different scales—from the county level through congressional districts, and up to states. The stationarity of the vote-share dispersion and the logarithmic decay of the spatial correlations will be considered as generic of the fluctuations in electoral dynamics. The evolution of the system can be expressed in terms of the transition rates r−ijðVÞ

Vi Ni þ þ
Findings
Number of elections
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call