Abstract
The length dependence of the voltage divider ratio (VDR) was investigated in a double cable model of tubular epithelia with point source current injection into the tubular lumen in order to find out, whether there is a region, in which the VDR - as in flat sheet epithelia - is an appropriate measure of the relative magnitude of the apical (ra) and basal (rb) cell membrane resistances. Irrespective of the choice of the cable parameters, we find that VDR, defined as luminal over cellular voltage deflection, overestimates the resistance ratio (ra + rb):rb near the origin, but underestimates it at distances (chi) greater than 1 luminal length constant (beta). In the region chi less than beta there is a crossover point, where VDR is an accurate estimate of the resistance ratio. If the difference between VDR at the origin and at large distances (chi greater than beta) is small, then VDR is a good estimate of the resistance ratio. This is also true, if VDR is constant between chi approximately 0.5 beta and chi greater than beta, (with the exception of some cases, in which the longitudinal resistance in the cell column is exceedingly high). If the latter conditions do not apply, we find that VDR, as measured at chi = beta, underestimates the resistance ratio at worst only by 8.8%, provided the cable properties are such that the luminal voltage attenuation exhibits only one single exponential (with maximum tolerable amplitude deviation of 5% at the origin).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.