Is the Self-Reporting of Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Patients Treated With Spinal Cord Stimulation in Line With Objective Measurements?

Abstract

To understand the subjective pain experience of patients, healthcare providers rely heavily on self-reporting. However, to quantify this unique pain experience, objective parameters are not yet available in daily clinical practice. With regard to patients with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) treated with spinal cord stimulation (SCS), pain therapists may recover the individual functional information about the patient's posture from the implantable pulse generator (IPG) of the stimulator. The aim of this study is to investigate whether subjective self-reporting is in correlation with the functional capacities of a patient. Thirty-nine patients with FBSS, treated with SCS were included. The accelerometer in the IPG detects positional changes and provides an objective output of seven functional positions (lying back, lying prone, lying left, lying right, transition, upright, and upright + mobile). The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), VAS-diary, and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) were assessed to evaluate physical functioning, pain intensities, and subjective sleep quality. Additionally, 21 patients wore a wearable actigraph device to objectify sleep quality. The agreement and Spearman correlations between objective and subjective parameters were assessed. Spearman rank correlations revealed no significant correlations between the ODI (subscales walking, sitting, standing, and sleeping) and the output of the IPG (percentage upright + mobile, transition, upright, and lying, respectively). Sleep parameters measured with the Actiwatch and the PSQI were not in agreement. This study demonstrated that self-reporting questionnaires do not correlate with the findings of objective measurements. Therefore, we recommend using both subjective and objective parameters when determining treatment options for FBSS patients.