Abstract
Abstract This study examines the extent to which children (N m = 60) at different ages master the reality status of fantasy figures for “affective” as opposed to cognitive reasons—that is, as a defense against fright and uncertainty. Thus, pictures of monsters taken from a widely acclaimed children's book were used to elicit thoughts regarding the fantasy/reality distinction. Contrary to prediction, nonreality did not equate with scariness for younger subjects; nor was there an age difference in the extent to which subjects focused on global, affectively significant features when justifying their reality classifications of the fantasy figures. Overall, young children appeared no less “objective” when making judgments of this sort than did older children and adults (N = 20).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
