Abstract
Reaction equilibrium can be mathematically described by the equilibrium equation and the reaction equilibrium composition can be calculated by solving this equation. It can be proved by non-elementary thermodynamic arguments that for a generic system with given initial composition, temperature and pressure there is a unique stable equilibrium state corresponding to the global minimum of the Gibbs free energy function. However, when the concept of equilibrium is introduced in undergraduate chemistry and chemical engineering courses, such arguments are generally not accessible. When there is a single reaction equilibrium among mixture components and the components form an ideal mixture, it has been demonstrated by a simple, elegant mathematical argument that there is a unique composition satisfying the equilibrium equation. It has been also suggested that this particular argument extends to non-ideal mixtures by simply incorporating activity coefficients. We show that the argument extension to non-ideal systems is not generally valid. Increasing non-ideality can result in non-monotonicity of the function crucial for the simple uniqueness argument, and only later it leads to non-uniqueness and hence phase separation. The main feature responsible for this is a composition dependence of activity coefficients in non-ideal mixtures.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have