Is the practice of using oversized organs for recipients with elevated pulmonary vascular resistance justified?

Abstract

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to assess post-transplantation outcomes in recipients with increased pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) in relation to donor size. MethodsThe United Network for Organ Sharing database was used to identify patients ages 0 to 18 years at time of listing who underwent transplantation from 2010 to 2019 and for whom cardiac catheterization and donor–recipient weight ratio data were available. Patients were divided according to listing PVR into <3, 3 to 6, and >6 Wood units. Donor–recipient weight ratio was categorized as undersized (≤0.80), midsize (0.81-1.2), and oversized (>1.2). Subgroup analysis was done with an additional supersized group (>2.0). ResultsFourteen hundred ninety-one patients met study criteria. Median age was 10 (interquartile range, 3-15) years and 45% were female. Four percent of heart transplantation cases used undersized, 45% used midsize, and 51% used oversized organs. More patients with PVR >6 were received an oversized organ transplant compared with patients with PVR <3; 59% (148/252) versus 48% (430/894); P = .003. There was no difference in survival among organ size groups regardless of PVR; this includes patients with PVR >6 at listing who received an oversized organ transplant versus an undersized (P = .359) or midsized (P = .956) organ. In subgroup analysis, even in patients who received a supersized organ transplant, there was no survival difference noted regardless of PVR. ConclusionsDespite a persistent practice pattern to transplant oversized organs in high-PVR patients, there remains no difference in post-transplantation survival among these patients and those who received smaller organ transplants. Therefore, transplants in patients with high PVR should not be delayed by waiting for larger donors.