Abstract
The use of bicycle power meters is becoming an increasingly popular, although somewhat costly, means of monitoring training adaptations in competitive cyclists. The PowerCal (PCal) is a low-cost power prediction device that may offer an alternative means of monitoring cycling performance. The aim of this study was to determine the validity and reliability of the PCal in comparison to a laboratory standard ergometer, over a range of constant load powers. Nine trained male cyclists (35±9yrs, 177±5cm, 74±6kg) completed two exercise trials on a Velotron ergometer (VTron) while wearing the PowerCal (PCal) device. During each trial participant’s performed six constant-load efforts commencing at 100W and increasing by 40W increments up to a final exercise intensity of 300W. Power output predicted by the PCal was significantly lower (p 0.05) in predicted power at any workload between repeat trials. The mean re-test typical error was similar (~6W) across all measured power outputs, corresponding to a mean coefficient of variation of ~5% between trials. The PCal reports substantially lower power outputs compared to the VTron ergometer. Furthermore the variability in the PCal measures across repeated trials of ~5% makes it unsuitable for monitoring performance changes that maybe considered worthwhile in trained competitive cyclists.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
