Abstract
In 2022, there have been several instances of the attempted damage to or destruction of high-value (cultural and economic) objects of art as a form of climate activism. In this letter, it is argued that the destruction of, or attempts to destroy, property is not a peaceful form of protest, and may constitute a criminal act. If unique art were to be destroyed through an act of climate activism, that would result in an irretrievable loss of profoundly important cultural icons. Moreover, activists may – through their destructive actions – land up irreversibly changing the culture of the appreciation of art. Even though these acts manage to garner global attention, it is argued that there are other productive non-destructive ways of drawing widespread attention to issues related to climate change without harming humanity’s precious cultural commodities.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
