Abstract
The sections of the California Consumer Privacy Act (CaCPA) dealing with price discrimination and are ill-conceived, badly written, and do not offer meaningful guidance or an answer to harmful pricing practices. In this article, I argue that the rules prohibiting discrimination based on a consumer’s exercise of her CaCPA rights are completely swallowed up by the exception that permits discrimination that is reasonably related to the value provided to the consumer, resulting in internal contradiction and legal uncertainty. Additionally, CaCPA’s disclosure mandates do not advance pricing transparency. Lastly, the liability sections contain large gaps that will allow businesses and their marketing intermediaries to absolve themselves of responsibility for privacy abuses.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.