Is targeted chemotherapy an alternative to immunotherapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia?

Abstract

Although molecular remission is now detected, it is still unknown whether we have the tools to cure B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (referred to as CLL). Nonetheless, several new therapeutic approaches have been introduced in cancer therapy during the last decade, including antiangiogenic therapy, apoptosis-inducing treatment and inhibition of heat shock proteins, farnesyl transferase, tyrosine kinases and proteasomes. These modalities may also be considered in CLL, but additional experimental characterization is required. Further characterization and development of CLL animal models should be a part of this preclinical work (especially xenografting in NOD/SCID animals, but also murine leukemia) to allow a more extensive evaluation prior to clinical trials. Animal models are particularly important for preclinical comparison of pharmacological effects between different disease compartments and for in vivo evaluation of antileukemic immune reactivity. However, T cell targeting therapy seems to have several advantages in comparison to other approaches: (1) based on the current clinical experience one would expect low toxicity for several of these strategies, especially vaccine treatment; (2) several studies have demonstrated that autologous T cells can recognize CLL cells; (3) experimental and clinical evidence suggests that immunotherapy can be combined with chemotherapy. Thus, T cell therapy has a relatively strong scientific basis that justifies further clinical studies of immunotherapy in CLL. Although several of the new pharmacological agents seem to have immunosuppressive effects, at least some of them (e.g. heat shock protein 90 inhibitors, proteasome inhibitors, inhibition of angiogenesis) appear to affect T cells only at relatively high concentrations and may thus be used in combination with immunotherapy.