Abstract
Controversies on the “strain glass” concept are discussed in the present paper. Both ferroic glassy theory and traditional anelasticity theory can explain the “strain glassy behavior”. However, due to the limited frequency range of internal friction measurements, it is difficult to distinguish whether “strain glass” is a nanodomain frozen transition or thermally activated process.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
