Is stability of femoral neck fractures in the inverted triangle configuration related to the angle between the fracture line and the cannulated compression screws? A finite element analysis

Abstract

Purpose Currently, treating femoral neck fractures (FNFs) with the inverted triangle configuration requires alignment between the femoral neck’s long axis and the axis of cannulated compression screws (CCS). To address whether the ‘parallel’ alignment is the most effective approach for fractures with varying Pauwels angles, we employed finite element analysis (FEA) to investigate how different angles between fracture line and CCS affect stability, based on various Pauwels angles. This study aims to offer improved guidance for treating FNFs with the inverted triangle configuration. Methods FNF models with Pauwels angles of 40°, 50°, 60°, and 70° were developed. The CCS were positioned in an inverted triangle configuration based on the angle between the fracture line and CCS. Using FEA, we compared the biomechanical properties of each model to evaluate the stability by evaluating five key parameters: maximal stress in the proximal femoral fracture fragment (MPFS) and implants (MIS), maximal displacement of the bone (MBD) and implants (MID), and maximal relative displacement of the fragments (MRD). Results For Pauwels angles of 40°, 50°, 60°, and 70° across different FNF models, various parameters exhibited similar results. The MPFS showed an upward trend with a decrease in the angle, whereas the MIS, MBD, MID, and MRD all exhibited downward trends. Conclusion The FEA results suggest that decreasing the angle between the fracture line and the CCS for the treatment of FNF can increase the tension resistance of the model, thus increasing the model’s stability.