Abstract
Since acupuncture came to western countries, research has been done to try and prove whether or not it is effective. Current Acupuncture research is most often based on the sham needle which was first designed by K Streitberger and J Kleinhenz in 1998. The sham acupuncture needles are developed for the control group and do not penetrate the skin. Sham acupuncture has been used in randomized controlled trial (RCT) for diseases which normally benefit from acupuncture treatment. The sham needle is not the best placebo needle though. Because of the use of sham acupuncture, the result of those research shows acupuncture having no effect or it shows there is no significant difference between real acupuncture (verum) and sham acupuncture (placebo). However, a detailed introduction of the Nine Classical Needles (ancient) and the Nine Modern Needles (SHI's nine needles) shows that the use of sham acupuncture in RCT research is flawed by design. This then casts doubt on the findings and conclusions reached by using sham acupuncture in RCT acupuncture research.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.