Abstract
Author(s): Cheung, King-Kok | Editor(s): Hart, Jonathan Locke | Abstract: Through an analysis of Akira Kurosawa’s Ran, Grigori Kozintsev’s King Lear, and Feng Xiaogang’s The Banquet, this essay contends that what makes Shakespeare popular across cultures—his prismatic vision—also makes his tragedies especially difficult to render faithfully in foreign adaptations. Intent on tracking a moral trajectory the Japanese, Russian, and Chinese auteurs are unable to replicate a distinctive hallmark of the mature tragedies—dubbed variously as “negative capability” (John Keats), “complementarity” (Norman Rabkin), “Comic Matrix” (Susan Snyder), “indefinition” (Stephen Booth), and “polyphony” (Marvin Rosenberg). But in adapting and incorporating scenarios and lines from the English original into different cultural milieus, these directors bring out dimensions hitherto uncharted in the two plays.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
