Is routine pathological evaluation of pediatric hernia sacs justified?

Abstract

Background/Purpose: Herniorrhaphy is the most common general surgical procedure performed on children, and hernia sac material is one of the most common tissue specimens microscopically examined in the authors' surgical pathology laboratory. The risk of accidental vas deferens ligation has prompted the recommendation that all hernia sacs be examined pathologically. The authors hypothesized that the incidence of unrecognized vas deferens or epididymis ligation is actually very low and may not warrant routine pathological examination of all pediatric hernia sacs. Methods: Over a 3-year period (1994 to 1996), pathology reports from all hernia repairs at the authors' institution were reviewed. A total of 1,494 inguinal hernia sacs were pathologically evaluated from 1,077 pediatric patients (417 were bilateral). Pathological diagnoses not affecting clinical management (ie, chronic inflammation, irritated hernia sacs, embryonal remnants, adrenal cortical rests) were classified as incidental findings. Identification of true vas deferens was classified as a positive finding. Results: The study population had a mean age of 3.9 ± 0.1 years and 963 (89%) were boys. The incidence of vas deferens injury from herniorraphy was found to be 0.13% (2 of 1,494), and these were recognized by the pediatric surgeon in the operating room. Conclusions: When vas deferens injury is suspected, the sample should always be sent to the pathology department for confirmation. However, no occult carcinoma or other pathology was identified, and the remainder of the histological findings did not change the clinical treatment of any child. Given a fixed cost of pathological analysis, elimination of routine hernia sac examination may result in substantial annual savings. Therefore, in the current era of cost containment, recommendations for routine pathological examination of excised pediatric hernia sacs should be reevaluated.