Abstract

Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) has been considered as a precursor of prostatic cancer. Few reports have dealt with the long-term follow-up of PIN lesions, and there is still a lack of proof that PIN is a true premalignant lesion. The objective of this study was to evaluate PIN in the transition/central zone as a marker for subsequent development of prostatic cancer. The PIN status of tissue specimens from 789 men without prostate cancer was determined in 508 transurethral resections and 281 transvesical prostatic enucleations. All slides were reviewed blind and independently by two pathologists. The patients were followed for an average of 11 years, and the incidence of subsequent cancer and cause-specific survival were analysed. Thirty-six cases of clinical prostatic cancer occurred among the cohort of 789 men through follow-up. No association between the presence of PIN in the transition/central zone and subsequent cancer development was found. There was also no difference in survival related to PIN status among the subsequent cancer patients.

Highlights

  • Thirty-six cases of prostate cancer were diagnosed in the follow-up period

  • There was no significant difference in the distribution of subsequent cancer occurrence of the various Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) groups. adjusted for age and coexisting atypical adenomatous hyperplasia

  • No increased risk for subsequent cancer of the prostate was found in a follow-up of 789 men for an average of 11 years after diagnosis of PIN lesions in transurethral and transvesical prostate resections

Read more

Summary

RESULTS

Average follow-up time was 11 years (range 1 month-20 years) with no difference among the various PIN groups. There was no significant difference in the distribution of subsequent cancer occurrence of the various PIN groups. A non-significant relative risk of 1.4 was found for the risk of subsequent prostate cancer among patients with atypical adenomatous hyperplasia. The influence of age on cancer occurrence was observed with a significant relative risk of 1.06. Indicating no significant difference (P = 0.70) in the risk of dying from subsequent prostate cancer according to PIN status

DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
The Norwegian Cancer Society
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call