Is pre-operative electromyography a reliable tool in differentiating acute and chronic facial palsy? A preliminary evaluation in patients treated with triple innervation facial reanimation

Abstract

Electromyographic evaluation is a reliable tool for confirming facial palsy and assessing its severity. It allows differentiating facial paresis and paralysis, and further distinguishes acute palsies, still showing muscle fibrillations, from chronic cases. This article aims to show that EMG fibrillations might represent a better criterion to differentiate acute and chronic palsies than the standard 18–24 months’ cut-off usually employed for classification and treatment purposes.We performed a cohort study using the eFACE tool for comparing triple innervation facial reanimation results in patients with EMG fibrillation treated <12 months, 12–18 months, and >18 months from paralysis onset.Patients showed a statistically significant post-operative improvement in all eFACE items, both in the whole sample and in the three groups. Only the deviation from the optimal score for the gentle eye closure item in group 2 didn't reach statistical significance (p = 0.173). The post-operative results were comparable in the three groups, as the Kruskal-Wallis test showed a difference only for the platysmal synkinesis item scores, which were significantly lower in group 3 (p = 0.025).EMG should represent a further tool to wide the group of paralysis patients that could be treated as recent facial palsy patients; Further prospective studies on pre-operative EMG fibrillations might allow for further refinement of the technique selection process.