Abstract
In this contribution we focus on the petitio principii fallacy and we review it under the tenets of different typical treatments. Then we submit the claim that petitio principii is indeed fallacious, not because of circularity—as the typical treatments suggest—, but because it fails to follow an order relation in Searle and Vanderveken's illocutionary logic. In other words, we claim that, although petitio principii arguments appear to be circular with respect to their propositional content, they are not circular with respect to their illocutionary acts. And hence, even when petitio principii arguments look like propositional loops and instances of reflexivity, they actually constitute a failure in an order relation, a non sequitur as it were.
Highlights
Fallacies have been traditionally defined as patterns of poor reasoning that appear to be good; this traditional approach has proved to be quite problematic and unsatisfactory, and several projects have emerged in order to overcome its issues._J_
In this contribution we focus on the petitio principii fallacy and we review it under the tenets of different typical treatments
We submit the claim that petitio principii is fallacious, not because of circularity —as the typical treatments suggest, but because it fails to follow an order relation in Searle and Vanderveken's illocutionary logic
Summary
Fallacies have been traditionally defined as patterns of poor (i.e. invalid) reasoning that appear to be good (i.e. valid); this traditional approach has proved to be quite problematic and unsatisfactory (cf. Hansen, 2000; Hamblin, 1970, p.12), and several projects have emerged in order to overcome its issues. To show how this is so, we focus on petitio principii—a fallacy known as question begging—and we review it under the tenets of different treatments. We submit the claim that petitio principii is fallacious, but not because of circularity—as the typical treatments suggest—, but because it does not verify an order relation (using Searle and Vanderveken's illocutionary logic), which turns out to be a rather traditional solution
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
