Abstract
Better outcomes for psychiatric inpatients classified as paranoid rather than nonparanoid could be due to group differences in disability levels created by traditional classification approaches. Paranoid functioning, per se, may not predict good institutional outcomes. The authors retrieved community outcome data for 469 inpatients from 19 wards, a subsample of participants that had been previously examined during their inpatient stay. Paranoid groups showed better community outcomes as an artifact of differences in disability levels when classifications were based on the traditional approach that requires a predominance of paranoid over nonparanoid behavior. No differential outcomes appeared when classifications were based on dimensionally measured paranoid functioning alone. In fact, dispositions of patients suggest that staff view paranoid behavior as a negative rather than positive prognostic indicator.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
