Abstract

Meta-analyses on the relationships of organisational commitment (OC), job satisfaction (JS) and organisational citizenship behaviour (OCB) have been used to assess necessity of one another by evaluating their causality through the notion of sufficiency. This study applies necessity condition analysis (NCA) on r values collected from a systematic review of the relationship between OC, JS, and OCB and tests their relations under the notion of necessity. Two meta-analyses were performed on 140 error adjusted effects reported from 70 studies which fulfilled study’s selection and inclusion criteria. Meta-analytical results provided positive and significant OC–JS (ř = 0.546) and OC–OCB (ř = 0.374) relationships. NCA scatterplot, statistics, and bottleneck analysis confirmed the necessity of OC–JS relationship for medium and high level of the desired OC–OCB relation. This study fulfilled the literature gap on the mutual relationship of OC, JS, and OCB by focusing on the notion of necessity rather than the traditional employed notion of sufficiency through a novel method that is testing necessity hypotheses through meta-analyses. For researchers, this method provides a novel approach to analyse meta-analytical data, while enabling practitioners for identifying and focusing on necessary relationships rather than diverging their energies and resources on factors that partially affect the outcomes.

Highlights

  • Behaviours that are considered outside the formal job requirements of an employee but assist in making the firm a better place and contributes towards the effective functioning of the firm, are collectively termed as organisational citizenshipA

  • Once the relationship between organisational commitment (OC) with job satisfaction (JS) and organisational citizenship behaviour (OCB) are meta-analysed and the strengths of these relationships established through random effects models and tests for heterogeneity, the Fisher z scores generated through Comprehensive Meta-Analysis’ (CMA) were subjected to ‘Necessary condition analysis’ (NCA) software developed by Dul (2016) to detect the necessity of OC–JS relationship, for the OC–OCB relationship

  • The purpose of this study was to subject a widely researched and meta-analysed relationships between OC, JS, and OCB to the notion of necessity to answer the substantive research question developed for this study that is: whether the relationships between OC and JS are necessary for the relationships between OC and OCB? As mentioned earlier the literature presents three causal relationships between these constructs, i.e., OC–JS model, a JS–OC model, and OC and JS though related yet independent and unique constructs model for the display of OCB To test all these relationships, we conducted two meta-analyses

Read more

Summary

Introduction

OCB has been associated with several desirable personal and organisational constructs and much research has been conducted on the antecedents of OCB Among these studies, organisational commitment (OC) has been repeatedly studied as an antecedent of OCB (e.g., Motaung, 2016; Prasetio, Yuniarsih, & Ahman, 2017; Williams & Anderson, 1991; Zeinabadi, 2010) The majority of these studies present a significant positive relationship between OC and OCB Previous meta-analyses on the relationship of OC and OCB reports a significant positive relationship between them (Cetin, Gu€rbu€z, & Sert, 2015; Gu€rbu€z, Enstitu€su€, et al, 2014; LePine, Erez, & Johnson, 2002; Meyer, Stanley, Herscovitch, & Topolnytsky, 2002; Podsakoff, Whiting, Podsakoff, & Blume, 2009). We find some studies that present a non-significant relationship between these constructs

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call