Abstract

The aim of this article is to evaluate one proposed solution to the problem that some aspects of a second language (L2) seem unacquirable. In order to understand the solution, it is necessary to explicate the problem. This will be done by providing a brief description of Fodor's (1983) modular view of the human mind, followed by an account of the views of two researchers on second language acquisition (SLA), namely that of Krashen (whose view is compatible with the modular view of the human mind) and that of White (whose view is not). These two researchers agree on many aspects of SLA, but disagree about whether learnt knowledge of language can become acquired knowledge. It is here that an interesting question arises, namely the question of whether certain aspects of an L2 can be learnt, but not acquired. One proposed answer to this problem, namely that of noticing, will be evaluated. Reasons why noticing is, at present, more of a problem than an answer will be provided, and a case will be made for the Noticing Hypothesis being testable in theory but not in practice.

Highlights

  • The aim of this article is to evaluate one proposed solution to the problem that some aspects of a second language (L2) seem unacquirable

  • In order to understand the solution, it is necessary to explicate the problem. This will be done by providing a brief description of Fodor's (1983) modular view of the human mind, followed by an account of the views of two researchers on second language acquisition (SLA), namely that of Krashen and that of White

  • Krashen's view on SLA is compatible with the modular view of the human mind, because both claim that information generated by the language module serves as input for the central processing (CP) module

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this article is to evaluate one proposed solution to the problem that some aspects of a second language (L2) seem unacquirable. In order to understand the solution, it is necessary to explicate the problem This will be done by providing a brief description of Fodor's (1983) modular view of the human mind, followed by an account of the views of two researchers on second language acquisition (SLA), namely that of Krashen (whose view is compatible with the modular view of the human mind) and that of White (whose view is not). These two researchers agree on many aspects of SLA, but disagree about whether learnt knowledge of language can become acquired knowledge. At present, more of a problem than an answer will be provided, and a case will be made for the Noticing Hypothesis being testable in theory but not in practice

MODULES OF THE MIND
NOTICING AS A SOLUTION
THE TESTABILITY OF THE NOTICING HYPOTHESIS
The testability in theory of the Noticing Hypothesis
The testability in practice of the Noticing Hypothesis
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call