Abstract

Aim This study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of a single labial injection of 4% articaine for the extraction of maxillary anterior teeth without the need for nasopalatine supplementary injection.Materials and methods A prospective, controlled, split-mouth clinical study was performed to evaluate the clinical performance of 4% articaine as a single labial infiltration anaesthesia for the extraction of maxillary anterior teeth and to compare it with the routine method of labial injection along with a supplementary nasopalatine injection using 2% lidocaine. Statistical analyses were performed, with the statistical significance being set at 5% level.Results A total of 37 patients met the inclusion criteria, and a statistically significant difference was observed in the reported pain during injection between the single labial articaine injection and the routine labial and palatal lidocaine injections (P <0.001). The extraction of maxillary anterior teeth was possible without the need for an additional nasopalatine injection in all the study patients (n = 37). The difference between both groups was statistically non-significant in terms of the pain encountered during extraction (P = 0.22).Conclusion With the use of 4% articaine as a single labial infiltration anaesthesia, nasopalatine nerve block for the extraction of maxillary anterior teeth may become an outdated modality.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.