Is motivated submaximization good enough for God?

Abstract

AbstractIn a recent article (Kraay 2013), I argued that some prominent responses to two important arguments for atheism invokedivine satisficing– and that the coherence and propriety of this notion have not been established. Chris Tucker (2016) agrees with my evaluation of divine satisficing, but disagrees with my exegesis of these responses. He argues that they should be understood as invokingmotivated submaximizationinstead. After reviewing the dialectical situation to date, I assess whether motivated submaximization can be deployed in such a way as to defeat these arguments for atheism. I argue that it's far from clear that it can.