Abstract

In the metaethical debate on moral internalism and externalism, appeal is constantly made to people's intuitions about the connection between moral judgments and motivation. However, internalists and externalists disagree considerably about their content. In this paper, we present an empirical study of laymen's intuitions about this connection. We found that they lend surprisingly little support to the most celebrated versions of internalism, which provides reason to be skeptical of the evidential basis for these views.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call