Abstract
We define two effects: (a) percentage difference between median CEO pay of compensation peers and their counterfactual peers (Peer pay effect, PPE), and (b) percentage difference between focal firm CEO pay and the median CEO pay of their compensation peers (CEO pay effect, CPE). We find a negative relation between M&A announcement period abnormal returns and pre-announcement PPE. The PPE (CPE) is lower (higher) in acquiring years relative to non-acquiring years. We show that the lower PPE is consistent with better governance and higher CPE is due to benchmarking against peers with higher median CEO pay and for completing acquisitions.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
