Abstract

The reasons why the range size of closely related species often varies significantly have intrigued scientists for many years. Among other hypotheses, species with high trait variation were suggested to occupy more diverse environments, have more continuity in their distributions, and consequently have larger range sizes. Here, using 34 tree species of lowlands tropical rainforest in southern Costa Rica, we explored whether inherent trait variability expressed at the local scale in functional traits is related to the species’ total geographical range size. We formed 17 congeneric pairs of one narrow endemic and one widespread species, sampled 335 individuals and measured eight functional traits: leaf area, leaf thickness, leaf dry matter content, specific leaf area, leaf nitrogen content, leaf phosphorus content, leaf nitrogen to phosphorus ratio, and wood specific gravity. We tested whether there are significant differences in the locally expressed variation of individual traits or in multidimensional trait variance between the species in congeneric pairs and whether species’ range size could hence be predicted from local trait variability. However, we could not find such differences between widely distributed and narrow range species. We discuss the possible reasons for these findings including the fact that higher trait variability of widespread species may result from successive local adaptations during range expansion and may hence often be an effect rather than the cause of larger ranges.

Highlights

  • Even closely related species often vary in range size by orders of magnitude [1]

  • For traits such as wood specific gravity (WSG) and leaf dry matter content (LDMC), Coefficients of variation (CV) were low (averages ± 1 standard deviation (SD): 0.09 ± 0.05 and 0.09 ± 0.04, respectively (S3 Fig) and most variance was explained by differences between genera (61.8% and 57.1% respectively, Fig 2)

  • Trait variability among individuals of the same species makes an important contribution to community-level trait variation in general [24]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Even closely related species often vary in range size by orders of magnitude [1]. The reasons of this variation have intrigued scientists for many years [1,2]. For example, occupy a narrow range because they have not had the chance to disperse after a range collapse following e.g. climatic changes [7], are evolutionary young [1], limited to isolated places like oceanic islands or mountain peaks [8], or adapted to rare habitat types [9]. Many species are range-restricted even without (evident) geographic barriers limiting their distributions [10,11,12], suggesting that factors other than dispersion are involved in shaping their ranges.

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.