Abstract

Litter decomposition is a key process in the carbon balance of soils. Commonly, plant litters occur in mixtures where the species differ in quality traits such as the nutrient concentration and organic carbon quality. Many studies explored if mixing litters retards or speeds up litter decomposition compared to species decomposing alone, with varying results. To identify consistent trends with an overarching quantitative synthesis, we test in a meta-analysis whether on average across studies, the mass loss of mixed litters of two plant species is faster than the average mass loss of single litters. We hypothesise that larger trait divergence of the litter quality of the species in a mixture results in a faster mass loss of the mixture than expected based on the single species. Furthermore we hypothesise that part of the variation in litter mixture mass loss can be explained by experimental design and environmental factors. Explanatory variables used were chemical litter trait dissimilarity in the C, N, P, lignin, cellulose, phenolics concentration as well as soil properties, ecosystem, climate, the duration of litter decomposition and the experimental design. Interactions were studied if supported by mechanistic hypotheses. In the majority of studies and on average, we found that the mass loss of mixed litters is equal to the weighted average of the mass loss of the constituent single litters. None of the hypothesised explanatory variables was consistently associated with litter mixture effects on the mass loss and explained variation in mass loss of significant models was invariably only a few percent of all variation. While further data exploration might elucidate further, interactive, patterns, many of these could not be explored due to lacking data. This meta-analysis therefore refutes the notion that mixing litters in general enhances rates of decomposition. We conclude that the effects of litter mixing are in many cases predictable from the decomposition rates of the individual species. According to our results, any interactive effects (positive or negative) between litter species are contextual, and cannot be generalized and predicted beyond the context in which the results were obtained.

Highlights

  • Plant litter input and its decomposition rate are the two primary controls on carbon storage in soil (Lützow et al, 2006)

  • After removing the duplicates we had a total of 677 publications. These publications were screened and a publication was included in our dataset if 1) It concerned a litter decomposition experiment which was conducted with the litterbag method, 2) mass loss was reported of both single species litters as well as a 2-species mixture, 3) The ratio of the two litters in the mixture was reported, 4) the time of exposure of litterbags to the envi­ ronment was stated

  • If we compare a litter mixture of a moss þ deciduous leaf to a litter mixture of a coniferous þ deciduous leaf, the litter nutrient concentration or C structure is important. Many other factors such as the litter thickness, hydrophobicity, wax layer, water holding capacity, size, etc. are likely to covary and play a role. This meta-analysis shows that the majority of reported results of studies on litter mixture mass loss can be predicted based on single litter mass loss since 85% of all 2-species litter mixtures show additive mass loss

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Plant litter input and its decomposition rate are the two primary controls on carbon storage in soil (Lützow et al, 2006). In order to estimate the amount of carbon returned to the soil and its potential residence time, litter decomposition rates need to be predicted (Aerts, 1997; Gessner et al, 2010). Crops are usually grown in a rotation of species such that litters with different quality are mixed in the soil over time. It is essential to get a better understanding of litter mixture decomposition mechanisms in order to be able to predict the consequences of plant species diversification in plant communities for carbon dynamics in soils

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call