Is Laparoscopy Underutilized for Sigmoid Volvulus?

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery has become increasingly prevalent. However, the majority of colectomies for volvulus are still performed via an open technique. The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a difference in outcomes between laparoscopic and open procedures for sigmoid volvulus. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and colectomy-targeted procedure databases were queried from 2013 to 2018. Patients undergoing partial colectomy without ileal resection for the indication of volvulus were compared based on approach (planned laparoscopic vs. planned open). The 2 groups were propensity score matched for perioperative variables. A subgroup analysis was performed comparing unplanned laparoscopic conversion to open (CTO) with planned open procedures. The primary outcomes were overall morbidity, mortality, and length of stay. Total 2493 patients were identified. Four hundred ninety-two cases began laparoscopically (20%), of which 391 were completed laparoscopically (79%). Laparoscopic approach was associated with longer operative times (133 vs. 104min, P <0.001). Laparoscopic approach was associated with decreased overall morbidity (OR: 0.71, 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.93) and decreased length of stay when >7 days (OR: 0.70, 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.94). On subgroup analysis, there was no difference in outcomes when comparing unplanned CTO to planned open approach. Laparoscopic approach is used in a fraction of cases for colonic volvulus. When utilized, the majority are completed without CTO. Laparoscopy is associated with fewer complications and shorter hospital stays. Even with unplanned conversion to open, there is no difference in outcomes compared against planned open procedures. Surgeons should consider the utilization of laparoscopy for colonic volvulus.