Abstract

Abstract Background: The most common emergency for surgery in the population is acute appendicitis. Though laparoscopic appendectomy is widely performed today, the advantages of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy remain under contro-versy. Aim of Study: To determine whether Laparoscopic Ap-pendectomy (LA) is better than thetraditional Open Appen-dectomy (OA). Patients and Methods: It is a prospective study, involving 150 patients with acute appendicitis. All patients undertook abdominoal and pelvic ultrasonography, to exclude any con-comitant gynecological finding and other cause for right iliac fossa pain. The patients were admitted to in Al-Zahraa University Hospital and Kobry El-Koba Military Hospital during the period from November 2017 to November 2019. Operational time, post-operative pain, first bowel movement, hospital stay, early work return and post-operative complications were compared in patients with open versus laparoscopic appen-dectomy. Results: OA and LA were performed in 150 patients (75 patients for each procedure). The laparoscopic technique gave less length of hospital stay (p=0.025), better in operative time, short hospital stay, low visual pain analogue range, first bowel motion recorded and early return to normal activity (p < 0.01), less intraoperative and post-operative complications 6.7% of all patients had complications post-operatively all in open group. Conclusion: The advantage of laparoscopic appendectomy is decreased pain following surgery, a short hospitalization, and an early return to work. Laparoscopic appendectomy should be recommended for acute appendicitis as an effective and safe procedure.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call