Abstract
Twenty-two patients with early dementia of Alzheimer's type (DAT) and 31 controls were administered tests of person-specific semantics (Experiment 1). DAT patients were impaired on all test components. In Experiment 2, 31 DAT patients, 28 questionable DAT (QDAT) patients, and 42 controls were administered the Graded Naming Test (GNT) and the newly designed Graded Faces Test (GFT), matched for difficulty with the GNT. DAT patients were impaired throughout but showed an advantage for naming objects over faces. The QDAT patients were impaired on the GFT only. Of the 7 QDAT patients who evolved to DAT within 1-2 years, 6 showed initial impairment on the GFT, whereas 17 of the nonconverters scored normally on the GFT. Results suggest greater and earlier vulnerability of person knowledge than general semantic knowledge in DAT.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
