Is it safe and practical to use a Foley catheter as a chest tube for lung cancer patients after lobectomy? A prospective cohort study with 441 cases

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study was conducted to explore the feasibility and safety of postoperative chest drainage with a Foley catheter for lung cancer patients undergoing a video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy. MethodsData from lung cancer patients who underwent a VATS lobectomy with insertion of a catheter (Foley catheter or 28-F chest tube) were analysed. A total of 441 patients were included preoperatively for participation, with 208 patients in the Foley catheter group and 233 in the 28-F group. ResultsIn the Foley catheter group, a shorter mean number of days was required until chest tube removal after lobectomy (2.6 ± 1.3 vs. 3.5 ± 2.0 d, P < 0.001) and postoperative length of stay was shorter (3.8 ± 2.5 vs. 5.2 ± 4.1 d, P < 0.001); The 28-F group had a higher average VAS score than did the Foley catheter group at 6 h (P = 0.025), and 48 h (P < 0.001) after VATS lobectomy as well as at 6 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, 30 days and 90 days after chest tube removal (P < 0.001). Regarding postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) and chest tube removal-related complications, the rate of PPCs was not found to be significant, and a significantly higher proportion of disordered wound healing at the drainage site was observed in the 28-F group (5.8%, 12/208 vs. 11.6%, 27/233; P = 0.043). ConclusionThe study indicated that placement of Foley catheter vs. 28-F chest tube was associated with a statistically significant but clinically modest reduction in pain, with shorter mean days until chest tube removal after lobectomy, shorter in-hospital stay, and a smaller proportion of disordered wound healing at the drainage site. These results indicate the feasibility and safety of postoperative chest drainage with a Foley catheter for lung cancer patients undergoing VATS lobectomy. Clinical registration numberChiCTR1800014816