Abstract

Objective Intraoperative frozen section examination of pelvic lymph nodes is frequently used in patients with cervical cancer, some of whom have received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). However, NACT can cause necrosis, fibrosis, or keratinization of tumor deposits in extirpated lymph nodes, and it is unclear whether intraoperative frozen section analysis of extirpated nodes is accurate after NACT. We analyzed the accuracy of frozen section examination of pelvic lymph nodes in patients after NACT for cervical cancer. Methods We reviewed 134 patients with invasive cervical cancer who underwent surgery including systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy with intraoperative frozen section examination of pelvic lymph nodes. Results of frozen section examination were related to definitive histology and compared between patient groups of NACT and primary surgery. Results A total of 1670 pelvic lymph nodes were evaluated intraoperatively by frozen section examination, and 6689 pelvic lymph nodes were analyzed by final histopathology. Overall frozen section analysis had nine false negative results among 53 patients with positive lymph nodes (false negative rate, 16.9%). After NACT, there were two false negative diagnoses in twelve patients with node metastases (false negative rate, 16.7%). No false positive cases were noted. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of frozen section examination were 83% and 82%, respectively, in patients after NACT, and 83% and 91% at primary surgery. Conclusion NACT does not appear to compromise the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative frozen section examination of pelvic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.